Independent Peer Review Manifesto

With the advancement of information and communication technologies, research has entered a new epoch. The proliferation of free, online, open access repositories of articles, data and code now enables scholars to use and share information more efficiently than ever before. As a result, we are witnessing the transformation of traditional research conducted by localized groups that depend on their own resources and merits, to a more dynamic and globally interconnected effort where ideas, tools and results are instantly accessible to the entire academic community. This transformation is bringing significant positive change to both research and society. Research output is becoming more visible, more reproducible and is having greater impact. Free access to knowledge is also helping policy-makers, institutions, grant-awarding bodies and the general public become more aware of the available information.

There is still, however, a serious obstacle blocking progress towards a truly open and democratic system of knowledge creation and exchange. At present, the formal evaluation of research output is exclusively controlled by academic journals that are also responsible for access to knowledge. Journal dominance over both, research evaluation and publication has led to an accumulation of influence that is limiting academia. Questionable measures of journal impact have become synonymous with prestige and are so pervasive that our academic worth as individuals is now being judged based upon where we publish instead of what we publish.

Commercial publishers became aware of our community’s dependency on journals and realized that researchers would not easily question their monopoly and that libraries would pay almost anything to regain access to their content. They bought journals, underwent mergers and gained so much power that they were able to ramp up subscription costs to extortionate levels and impose embargos on the public release of content. The commercial publishing industry has even led historical, society-based, non-profit journals either to shrink or to be forced into changing their mission to sustain their existence as costs are transferred onto authors and their academic institutions. In developing countries and in the periphery of Europe where limited funds are insufficient to meet publishers’ financial demands, scientific progress and academic education is deteriorating. The overall consequence is a loss of potential knowledge creation, brain drain and the growth of an unsustainable knowledge divide.

Since the problem has its roots in the combined power of evaluation and publication under a single authority (journals), the solution lies in separating these powers. Although the majority of researchers feel that journals are essential to scholarly communication, more and more voices are being raised and are questioning the way journal peer review is used to certify the validity and quality of our work. Indeed, there is a growing conviction among scholars that scientific progress and society would benefit from the open and transparent scrutiny of original ideas, results, data and code by the entire academic community, whose collective wisdom can lead to a more accurate and objective evaluation. To achieve immediate, free, journal-independent, open and transparent peer review, we propose the following four complementary strategies:

I. Immediate free public access: Scholars post, and license their research output (articles, linked data and open source code) in free, open electronic archives (preprint archives, institutional repositories etc.) immediately. It is important that archives provide persistent digital object identifiers to content and have a zero-embargo policy.

II. Independent peer review: With the consent of authors, research output is independently reviewed by an unlimited number of voluntary peers whose reviews should be signed, made immediate public access, and conform to a standard digital format so that metadata can be indexed and harvested as for published articles. Reviews are licensed and assigned a persistent digital object identifier so that reviewers receive proper academic credit for their work. It is important that no limit is imposed on the number of independent assessments so that collective wisdom can be used as a resource to filter out biased views. Openness and transparency in the review process will allow the community to control possible conflicts of interest.

III. Versioning and dissemination: Scholars respond to reviews and public commentary and archive new versions of their work. A free public access revised article linked to the independent peer review of its previous version, constitutes an Open Publication which is indexed and citable. Academic journals can solicit open publications from the authors and use all available technological means to efficiently package and distribute them to relevant audiences as a value-added service.

IV. Open evaluation: Academic evaluation committees judge scholars based on the quality of their work as reflected by independent peer reviews and not by superficial criteria such as the name of the journal where the work is published or by application of statistically-flawed bibliometric indices.

Our goal is an independent, democratic academic evaluation model free from the conflicts of interest imposed by the agendas of journals and their commercial publishers. Together, the complementary strategies we propose above comprise the ingredients needed to attain this goal. Importantly, such strategies are already within the reach of scholars and can co-evolve in parallel to the current traditional journal publishing system. While we wish to promote these complimentary strategies, we also encourage scholars and interested parties to experiment with new modes that can assist the transition to free, independent, open and transparent peer review. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation are key to ensuring that progress will be speedy, effective, safe and long lasting. We consider, however, that any platform developed to implement free and open peer review should be independent of intermediaries. To mitigate potential conflicts of interest such platforms should ideally be under the management of an open community, be open source and operate in a non-profit manner.

Our initiative is open to all scholars who share our vision and wish to promote our common goal by helping to:

  • widen the debate around free public access and independent peer review,
  • exert collective pressure on existing and forthcoming institutional online repositories to implement the complimentary strategies,
  • call for recognition and consideration of published independent reviews in grant, promotion and tenure evaluation,
  • support mandates that require researchers to self-archive with free public access.

We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars to engage in a sincere dialogue about the need for independent peer-review in order to build a future in which academic ideas and results can be objectively assessed and become trusted by researchers and society alike.


Open Scholar C.I.C.

To sign as an organisation please send an e-mail to:

Sign the Manifesto

I endorse the Independent Peer Review Manifesto


340 signatures

Share this with your friends:


Latest Signatures
340Alexia CeronMexicoUniversidad Autonoma de TlaxcalaMay 14, 2022
339Wai NgSpainIGMEMay 03, 2022
338Laura GutiérrezSpainEstudianteApr 30, 2022
337Diego Alfonso Campos RiveraPeruUniversidad Ricardo PalmaApr 28, 2022
336Clifton Paucar Y MontenegroPeruUniversidad Nacional Hermilio ValdizánApr 09, 2022
335Omar ElabdaliMoroccoEstudiante en Institut Narcis Monturiol de QuimicaMar 31, 2022
333Fatma BassyouniEgyptNational Research Centre, Cairo, EgyptMar 04, 2022
332James NichollsIsle of ManMann Isle Geoscience LtdMar 03, 2022
331Lisbeth MartínezColombiaEstudiante Feb 24, 2022
330Miroslav MacekMéxicoUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, FES IztacalaJan 26, 2022
329nerea manuelSpainEuroaulaDec 26, 2021
328Laura MartínezSpainUniversidad de AlcaláDec 21, 2021
326Mario Antonio Martínez RomeroMexicoEstudianteNov 12, 2021
325Ramon TronchSpainEstudianteNov 05, 2021
324Mohamed RihanEgyptMinistry of tourism and antiquitiesOct 20, 2021
323Francisco Mella SánchezEspañaEstudiante de enfermería UDCOct 06, 2021
322Sofia PintoArgentinaStudentOct 03, 2021
321Manuel MedinaPeruEstudianteSep 27, 2021
320Rebeca VazquezMéxicononeSep 08, 2021
319Raquel Gil MonteroArgentinaCONICET - INCIHUSASep 07, 2021
317Marina CastroSpainUniversidad de MálagaSep 01, 2021
316Hector Jovany Sanchez RodriguezMéxicoEstudianteJul 07, 2021
315Elizabeth TerlindenUnited StatesArizona State UniversityJun 26, 2021
314Ane ArratibelSpainIndependienteJun 15, 2021
313Daniel EstradaColombiaEstudianteJun 11, 2021
312Yulissa Guerrero MexicoUAM Jun 03, 2021
311Juan Ramon Vidal RomaniSpainEmeritus Professor University of CorunaJun 01, 2021
310Karla Montenegro CornejoPortugalUniversity of LisbonMay 30, 2021
309Aristóbulo BauselaSpainInvestigadorMay 22, 2021
308Pablo Fdez-ArroyabeEspañaUniversidad de CantabriaMay 21, 2021
307nayeli torres villosladaPeruuniversidad peruana union May 16, 2021
306Charlie BurlinghamUnited StatesNew York UniversityMay 04, 2021
305Daysaríh Tápanes RobauCubaPhd StudentApr 28, 2021
304Khaeruddin KiramangIndonesiaState Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) BoneMar 23, 2021
303Bianca IrigoyenPerúUniversidad Científica del Sur Mar 19, 2021
302Teresa CobosMéxicoCentro de Investigaciones en CorrosiónMar 10, 2021
301Laura Vanessa Avendaño PerezColombiaUniversidad Piloto de ColombiaMar 09, 2021
300Jorge RodasEcuadorUniversidad Catolica de CuencaMar 08, 2021
299Noemí del Socorro Lázaro PérezMexicoEgresado de la Lic. en GenómicaFeb 27, 2021
298Juliana TalbotEcuadorEstudianteJan 13, 2021
297Julio César Arellano BarragánPerumaestro en Microbiologia Jan 02, 2021
296SAMUEL CARMONAEspañaUNIMED-centro de desarrollo e innovación medica Nov 22, 2020
295Luis PeredaPeruUNCNov 18, 2020
294Zakir Nair ArmeniaUniversity Of Wisconsin Oct 31, 2020
293nahieli castañedaMéxicoUADYOct 27, 2020
292sandra patricia carrillo castellanosColombiaestudianteOct 26, 2020
291Marta De La Cruz MéxicoUniversidad Autónoma MetropolitanaOct 16, 2020