Which are the most appropriate evaluation dimensions (e.g. methodology, originality, clarity, etc)?

Home Forums An open forum to discuss the future of peer review Which are the most appropriate evaluation dimensions (e.g. methodology, originality, clarity, etc)?

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #2355 Score: 0
      admin
      Keymaster

      A reviewer could provide more quantitative information about a research work than the simple binary choice of accept or reject. Is this something meaningful? If yes, which are the most appropriate evaluation dimensions —or aspects— of a research work? Should they discipline specific?

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.