Open Scholar C.I.C.
  • About us
    • Our Mission
    • The Organisation
    • Working Team
    • Members
    • Advisory Board
  • Projects
    • The Self-Journal of Science
    • Open Peer Review for Repositories
    • Peer Review Forum
    • Author-guided Peer Review
    • Independent Peer Review Manifesto
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Contact

Michael Taylor

  • Profile
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Favorites

Forum Topics Started

Viewing topic 1 (of 1 total)
    • Topic
    • Voices
    • Posts
    • Freshness
    • How could evaluation dimensions be used to form quality metrics?

      Started by:  Michael Taylor in: An open forum to discuss the future of peer review

    • 1
    • 1
    • 3 years, 10 months ago

       Michael Taylor

  •  

Viewing topic 1 (of 1 total)

Login

Log In

− 1 = 2

Register Lost Password

Search Forums

  • Most popular topics
  • Topics with no replies

Recent Topics

  • Can we use base article-level research evaluation on open reviews and how?
  • How can we combine existing tools to achieve this goal?
  • How could evaluation dimensions be used to form quality metrics?
  • What is the optimal format for a review?
  • What is the ultimate goal of peer review and how can we decide/quantify when it has reached its goal?

Recent Replies

  • What is the optimal format for a review?
  • What is the optimal format for a review?
  • Can we use base article-level research evaluation on open reviews and how?
  • What is the optimal format for a review?
  • Should reviews be open (all reviewer comments made publicly available) and transparent (reviewer identity disclosed to the authors and the public)?

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets
Open Scholar C.I.C. All rights reserved. Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress