Which are the most appropriate evaluation dimensions (e.g. methodology, originality, clarity, etc)?

Home Forums An open forum to discuss the future of peer review Which are the most appropriate evaluation dimensions (e.g. methodology, originality, clarity, etc)?

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  admin 3 years, 2 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #2355 Score: 0

    admin
    Keymaster

    A reviewer could provide more quantitative information about a research work than the simple binary choice of accept or reject. Is this something meaningful? If yes, which are the most appropriate evaluation dimensions —or aspects— of a research work? Should they discipline specific?

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.